A Critical Response to Episodes Five and Six of Touraj Daryaee’s Podcasts: Cyrus, Cambyses, Bardiya, and Darius The fifth and sixth episodes of Touraj Daryaee’s podcasts raise important questions concerning Cyrus the Great, Cambyses II, Bardiya, and Darius I, and, more broadly, concerning the historical foundations of Iranian political identity. Daryaee is right to emphasize the extraordinary importance of Cyrus and to place the early Persian Empire within a wider history of cultural and religious pluralism. Nevertheless, several aspects of his interpretation deserve further examination. My purpose here is not to diminish Daryaee’s scholarship, nor to deny the extraordinary administrative and imperial achievements of Darius the Great. Rather, the purpose is to ask whether the narrative presented in these episodes gives sufficient attention to competing interpretations of the evidence—particularly concerning the relationship between Elam and Persia, the genealogy of Cyrus, the controver...
Posts
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
The Reign of Mohammad Shah Qajar (1834–1848) and the Early Germination of Constitutional Thought One year after the death of Abbas Mirza, his father, Fath-Ali Shah Qajar, died on Thursday, October 23, 1834, at the age of sixty-three, after a reign of thirty-seven years. In the wake of his death, the throne passed to his grandson, Mohammad Shah Qajar, the son of Abbas Mirza, who ascended with the decisive support of the Farahani statesman Haji Mirza Aqasi. The succession did not unfold in a purely domestic context. Both the Russian and British governments had previously recognized Abbas Mirza as the legitimate heir to the Persian throne in their diplomatic arrangements with Iran. Consequently, their representatives—John Campbell and Ivan Simonich—extended political and, where necessary, military support to ensure a smooth transfer of power to Mohammad Shah. Their intervention was guided less by dynastic loyalty than by strategic calculation: any contest among rival princes risked destab...